Ali v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1271
The applicant did not satisfy the visa criteria in clause 572.211 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) as his last substantive visa was not of a kind listed in clause 572.211(3)(b); therefore, his visa application was bound to fail, and there was no arguable case for extension of time or leave to appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'visa Criteria']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant satisfies the criteria in clause 572.211 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)' 'Whether extension of time and leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court decision was affected by jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not satisfy the visa criteria in clause 572.211 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) as his last substantive visa was not of a kind listed in clause 572.211(3)(b); therefore, his visa application was bound to fail, and there was no arguable case for extension of time or leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application fixed in the sum of $1756, to be paid by instalments as arranged."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment