Application by Bill Bayeh under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2012] NSWSC 1358
The application for an inquiry into conviction and sentence was refused pursuant to s 79(3)(a)(iii) and (b) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, on the basis that there was no additional evidence placed before the court which could raise a doubt or question as to the applicant's guilt or sentence, and that the applicant's assertions were unsupported, with no explanation for the delay.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bill Bayeh; Crown Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 78 Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 / Decision on Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Application to Set Aside Guilty Pleas, Inquiry Into Conviction and Sentence, Delay in Application, Absence of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bill Bayeh
Applicant
Regina
Crown Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 78 Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 / Decision on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are grounds to direct an inquiry into conviction and sentence under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001
- 2 Whether delay or lack of evidence justifies refusal to consider application
- 3 Whether applicant's assertions warrant further consideration
Ratio Decidendi
The application for an inquiry into conviction and sentence was refused pursuant to s 79(3)(a)(iii) and (b) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, on the basis that there was no additional evidence placed before the court which could raise a doubt or question as to the applicant's guilt or sentence, and that the applicant's assertions were unsupported, with no explanation for the delay.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application under s 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 dismissed
- Refusal to further consider application under s 79
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment