Arambatzis v Foundas (No 3) [2021] NSWCA 189
The previous referral for pro bono assistance under the UCPR remains effective and ongoing in the absence of compliance with r 7.39 conditions for cessation; directions for evidence, submissions, adjournment, extension of stay, and procedural orders are made accordingly to progress the motion and maintain fairness to the unrepresented litigant.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Peter Arambatzis; Defendant/applicant: Cassiani Foundas; Plaintiff: Bill Foundas; First Defendant/first Respondent: Sean Magnus Wengel; Second Defendant/first Respondent: Robert William Whitton
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Interlocutory Motions / Procedural Directions Before Hearing on Motion
- Outcome
- Directions and interlocutory orders made, including extension of stay, procedural steps for evidence and submissions, further pro bono referral (if required), and administrative directions.
- Legal Topics
- Pro Bono Referral, Extension of Stay, Transfer of Notice of Motion, Unrepresented Litigant, Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Arambatzis
Plaintiff/respondent
Cassiani Foundas
Defendant/applicant
Bill Foundas
Plaintiff
Sean Magnus Wengel
First Defendant/first Respondent
Robert William Whitton
Second Defendant/first Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Interlocutory Motions / Procedural Directions Before Hearing on Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further pro bono referral should be made under UCPR
- 2 Whether ongoing effect of previous pro bono referral remains operative
- 3 Whether to grant a further extension of stay of writ of possession
Ratio Decidendi
The previous referral for pro bono assistance under the UCPR remains effective and ongoing in the absence of compliance with r 7.39 conditions for cessation; directions for evidence, submissions, adjournment, extension of stay, and procedural orders are made accordingly to progress the motion and maintain fairness to the unrepresented litigant.
Court Disposition
Directions and interlocutory orders made, including extension of stay, procedural steps for evidence and submissions, further pro bono referral (if required), and administrative directions.
Orders
- By 6 September 2021, Mrs Foundas to file and serve any further affidavit or documentary evidence and submissions in support of her Notice of Motion filed 21 May 2021 and any relief to like effect.
- By 27 September 2021, the respondents to file and serve any evidence and submissions in response.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment