Regina v Lesi [2005] NSWCCA 63

Regina v Lesi [2005] NSWCCA 63

The applicant did not demonstrate error justifying intervention on sentence, as the application of the guideline judgment was proper, there was no doubling up in sentencing on the assault, there was no misapplication of parity with the co-offender, and a less severe sentence was not warranted in law despite the error in applying an 'exceptional circumstances' test to depart from guideline.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Billy Lesi
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentence, Parity, Co Offender, Guideline Judgment, Robbery in Company, Armed Robbery, Assault, Sentencing Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Billy Lesi

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying guideline judgment in R v Henry to robbery in company
  2. 2 Whether there was error in the accumulation of sentences
  3. 3 Whether parity principle was correctly applied in relation to a co-offender

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not demonstrate error justifying intervention on sentence, as the application of the guideline judgment was proper, there was no doubling up in sentencing on the assault, there was no misapplication of parity with the co-offender, and a less severe sentence was not warranted in law despite the error in applying an 'exceptional circumstances' test to depart from guideline.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against sentence granted
  • Appeal dismissed