BIM21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 307

BIM21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 307

The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospects of success, the primary judge correctly applied the law and found proper notification was given, and procedural requirements under the Migration Act were met. It was not in the interests of justice to allow the application to continue.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 2024
Procedural Posture
Migration – Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit and Family Court Decision
Outcome
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'summary Dismissal' 'procedural Fairness' 'deemed Service of Documents']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'summary Dismissal' 'procedural Fairness' 'deemed Service of Documents']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration – Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal From a Federal Circuit and Family Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the application for extension of time and leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether the primary judge erred in dismissing the judicial review application for want of reasonable prospects' 'Whether procedural requirements relating to notification and attendance at Tribunal were met']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospects of success, the primary judge correctly applied the law and found proper notification was given, and procedural requirements under the Migration Act were met. It was not in the interests of justice to allow the application to continue.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs, to be taxed, if not agreed."]