Birdon Marine Pty Limited v Glenn Alexander Jepp [2009] NSWCA 147
The appeal was dismissed because the primary judge was correct to find no negligence by Macquarie in relation to the second accident: the activity of standing on the lowest rung of a step ladder for non-hazardous duties was within the suggested work restrictions. Birdon Marine was not permitted to advance on appeal a substantially different and more detailed Thackham valuation case, having run only a truncated broad-brush argument at trial and having failed to prove the value or allocation of past and future compensation payments. The primary judge's assessments of future economic loss and future out-of-pocket expenses were open on the evidence and correct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Workers' Compensation and Negligence Appeal / Appeal From District Court of New South Wales Decision of Finnane DCJ Dated 10 December 2007
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['workers Compensation Act 1987 (nsw) S 151 Z' 'workers Compensation Act 1987 (nsw) S 151 H' 'successive Injuries' 'third Party Liability' 'employer Contribution' 'future Workers Compensation Payments' 'assessment of Damages' 'future Economic Loss']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation and Negligence Appeal / Appeal From District Court of New South Wales Decision of Finnane DCJ Dated 10 December 2007
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Macquarie was negligent or otherwise responsible for the second accident on 23 November 2002.' 'Whether the primary judge correctly applied Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) s 151Z and the principles in Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham (1995) 36 NSWLR 492 to workers compensation payments for the second injury.' 'Whether Birdon Marine should be permitted on appeal to advance a more detailed Thackham calculation than was advanced at trial.' 'Whether the primary judge erred in assessing future economic loss and future out-of-pocket expenses.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the primary judge was correct to find no negligence by Macquarie in relation to the second accident: the activity of standing on the lowest rung of a step ladder for non-hazardous duties was within the suggested work restrictions. Birdon Marine was not permitted to advance on appeal a substantially different and more detailed Thackham valuation case, having run only a truncated broad-brush argument at trial and having failed to prove the value or allocation of past and future compensation payments. The primary judge's assessments of future economic loss and future out-of-pocket expenses were open on the evidence and correct.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.' 'The appellant to pay the costs of the first and second respondents.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment