Huang v Attapallil [2016] NSWSC 1904

Huang v Attapallil [2016] NSWSC 1904

Reasons advanced by Ms Huang were insufficient to justify an adjournment, as the issues before the court were not complex, Ms Huang had had the opportunity to file affidavits, and there would be no injustice or prejudice to the parties if the matter proceeded.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment
Outcome
Application for adjournment refused.
Legal Topics
['application for Adjournment' 'interests of Justice' 'procedural Fairness']
['practice and Procedure'] ['application for Adjournment' 'interests of Justice' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an adjournment of the hearing should be granted in the interests of justice']

Ratio Decidendi

Reasons advanced by Ms Huang were insufficient to justify an adjournment, as the issues before the court were not complex, Ms Huang had had the opportunity to file affidavits, and there would be no injustice or prejudice to the parties if the matter proceeded.

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment refused.

Orders

  • ['Application for adjournment is refused.']