Huang v Drumm (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 104
Because Ms Huang does not consent to the making of the order sought to set aside the stay, a single judge has no power to make that order. The matter will proceed to a directions hearing before further steps can be taken.
- Parties
- Applicant: Biru Huang; Respondent: Bernard Joseph Drumm
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Directions Hearing Prior to Appeal
- Outcome
- Directions hearing fixed
- Legal Topics
- Directions Hearing, Stay of Proceedings, Jurisdiction, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Biru Huang
Applicant
Bernard Joseph Drumm
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Directions Hearing Prior to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court has jurisdiction as a single Judge to set aside orders without consent
- 2 Whether orders staying proceedings were properly made under inherent jurisdiction, Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 67, and Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 (Cth) s 17
- 3 Whether setting aside the abuse of process stay removes the foundation for the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Because Ms Huang does not consent to the making of the order sought to set aside the stay, a single judge has no power to make that order. The matter will proceed to a directions hearing before further steps can be taken.
Court Disposition
Directions hearing fixed
Orders
- A directions hearing concerning the conduct of Ms Huang's appeal be fixed for 9.30am on Monday 20 May 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment