BKY15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1426
The appellant's general grounds of appeal and oral submissions did not establish any jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, and he did not show any error in the reasoning of the Federal Circuit Court; accordingly, the appeal had to be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Dismissal of Application for Review of Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Federal Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Findings' 'procedural Fairness' 'complementary Protection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Dismissal of Application for Review of Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Federal Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal made jurisdictional error in affirming the delegate's decision not to grant the appellant a protection visa." 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in dismissing the application for review of the Tribunal decision.' "Whether the appellant's challenges to the Tribunal's credibility findings and factual findings disclosed reviewable error."]
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's general grounds of appeal and oral submissions did not establish any jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, and he did not show any error in the reasoning of the Federal Circuit Court; accordingly, the appeal had to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed with costs fixed at $6,431.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment