Black Label Developments Pty Ltd v McMenemy [2024] NSWDC 516

Black Label Developments Pty Ltd v McMenemy [2024] NSWDC 516

A stay of enforcement of the adjudication judgment under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 is justified where there is a strong prima facie case the deed of variation was procured under duress, undue influence, or unconscionable conduct, especially where the owner offers to pay the judgment sum into court and the proceedings challenging the deed are being prosecuted. Policy considerations under the Act are outweighed in this residential home context by the serious issues to be tried.

Parties
Plaintiff: Black Label Developments Pty Ltd; Defendant: Nicholas John McMenemy
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Stay Application (interlocutory) Following Judgment on Adjudication Certificate
Outcome
Stay of enforcement of judgment granted upon condition; costs awarded to defendant; proceedings stood over for directions.
Legal Topics
Stay of Enforcement of Judgment, Duress, Unconscionable Conduct, Contracts Review Act 1980, Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, Variation of Contract, Residential Building Dispute
Civil Procedure Building and Construction Law Contract Law Stay of Enforcement of Judgment Duress Unconscionable Conduct Contracts Review Act 1980 Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Black Label Developments Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Nicholas John McMenemy

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Stay Application (interlocutory) Following Judgment on Adjudication Certificate

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to grant a stay of enforcement of judgment obtained under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 pending final determination of related proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the deed of variation was entered under duress, undue influence, unconscionable conduct, or is otherwise void or voidable
  3. 3 Whether the Defendants have established a strong prima facie case justifying a stay

Ratio Decidendi

A stay of enforcement of the adjudication judgment under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 is justified where there is a strong prima facie case the deed of variation was procured under duress, undue influence, or unconscionable conduct, especially where the owner offers to pay the judgment sum into court and the proceedings challenging the deed are being prosecuted. Policy considerations under the Act are outweighed in this residential home context by the serious issues to be tried.

Court Disposition

Stay of enforcement of judgment granted upon condition; costs awarded to defendant; proceedings stood over for directions.

Orders

  • On condition that the defendant pay into court the judgment sum less the amount recovered already by the plaintiff under garnishee within 7 days, judgment and orders in NSW District Court proceedings 2024/201168 be stayed pending resolution of 2024/250069
  • Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the motion