Blacktown City Council v Li and Ors [2014] NSWLEC 1046
Although there had been a valid brothel closure order and a past failure to comply, the premises were no longer being used as a brothel and there was no present failure to comply. Because s 121ZS required a present failure to comply as a jurisdictional fact, the Court lacked jurisdiction to make the utilities order sought, and the application was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Application for a Utilities Order Under S 121 ZS of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['utilities Order' 'brothel Closure Order' 'jurisdictional Fact' 'costs Undertaking']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Application for a Utilities Order Under S 121 ZS of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court had jurisdiction under s 121ZS of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to make a utilities order where the premises were no longer being used as a brothel.' 'Whether there was a failure to comply with a brothel closure order sufficient to found the application.' 'Whether proposed undertakings by the second and third respondents could be accepted in the proceedings.' 'Whether the nonappearance and non-engagement of the second and third respondents justified making the utilities order sought.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although there had been a valid brothel closure order and a past failure to comply, the premises were no longer being used as a brothel and there was no present failure to comply. Because s 121ZS required a present failure to comply as a jurisdictional fact, the Court lacked jurisdiction to make the utilities order sought, and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' "The Court noted the undertaking given on behalf of the first respondent to pay the applicant's costs as agreed in the amount of $3,000, with payment to be made within 28 days of the order."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment