Blaxland Park Pty Limited v Blue Mountains City Council [2001] NSWLEC 156
The revised development proposal is so different in nature and character from the original that it constitutes a new development requiring a fresh application. The Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a new development application through an amendment, and cannot consent to the amendment or allow reliance on the amended plans.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Application for Leave to Amend Development Application
- Outcome
- Notice of motion to amend development application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'subdivision' 'cluster Housing' 'community Title' 'leave to Amend']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Application for Leave to Amend Development Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the substitute subdivision plan for cluster housing development and community title constitutes an amendment to the original development application' 'Whether leave should be granted to rely on the amended plans']
Ratio Decidendi
The revised development proposal is so different in nature and character from the original that it constitutes a new development requiring a fresh application. The Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a new development application through an amendment, and cannot consent to the amendment or allow reliance on the amended plans.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion to amend development application dismissed
Orders
- ['The notice of motion dated 18 June 2001 is dismissed.' 'The exhibits may be returned.' 'The matter to be listed for further callover before the Registrar at a date convenient to the parties and the Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment