BLAYNEY ABATTOIRS PTY LIMITED v O'DEA [1995] NSWCA 48
Partial incapacity for work under the Workers Compensation Act refers to reduced physical capacity due to physical disability, and does not require actual economic loss; the date of incapacity was correctly determined as 29 August 1989 based on medical evidence; the assessment of 15 percent permanent loss of efficient use of the left arm below the elbow was supported by medical opinion, and there was no error requiring appellate intervention.
- Parties
- Appellant: Blayney Abattoirs Pty Limited; Appellant: QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Pty Limited; Respondent: Robert John O'Dea; Respondent: Heath Workers Compensation (NSW) Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Workers' Compensation Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Incapacity for Work, Meaning of Incapacity, Date of Injury, Loss of Earning Power, Assessment of Impairment, Aggravation of Disease, Compensation Quantum
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Blayney Abattoirs Pty Limited
Appellant
QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Pty Limited
Appellant
Robert John O'Dea
Respondent
Heath Workers Compensation (NSW) Pty Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers' Compensation Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'incapacity' within section 16(1)(b) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 involves the necessary concept of economic loss.
- 2 Whether incapacity refers to reduced physical capacity by reason of physical disability for work in the relevant labour market.
- 3 Was the date of injury correctly determined as 29 August 1989 or should it have been after 15 June 1990?
Ratio Decidendi
Partial incapacity for work under the Workers Compensation Act refers to reduced physical capacity due to physical disability, and does not require actual economic loss; the date of incapacity was correctly determined as 29 August 1989 based on medical evidence; the assessment of 15 percent permanent loss of efficient use of the left arm below the elbow was supported by medical opinion, and there was no error requiring appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment