BLD15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 72
The interests of justice favour granting the Minister's application for adjournment so that the High Court may clarify the relevant legal point, which could be decisive. Such adjournment best promotes the statutory overarching purpose of just and efficient dispute resolution.
- Parties
- Appellant: BLD15; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Adjournment; Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- Minister's application for adjournment granted
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment Applications, Procedural Fairness, Certificate Disclosure Under Migration Act, Civil Practice and Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BLD15
Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Adjournment; Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adjournment pending High Court determination is in interests of justice
- 2 Whether procedural fairness required certificate disclosure to visa applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The interests of justice favour granting the Minister's application for adjournment so that the High Court may clarify the relevant legal point, which could be decisive. Such adjournment best promotes the statutory overarching purpose of just and efficient dispute resolution.
Court Disposition
Minister's application for adjournment granted
Orders
- Appellant must file an amended notice of appeal by 10 February 2017.
- Matter adjourned for directions until 9.30 am on the first Monday following determination by the High Court of the special leave application in proceeding M12/2017 (Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh), or if that application is granted, determination of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment