R v Mankotia [2001] NSWCCA 52
The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal is bound by established High Court authority that, for the objective test in s 23(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), characteristics such as the accused's ethnic or cultural background are not to be attributed to the ordinary person; it was correct for the trial judge to so direct...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'murder' 'provocation' 'jury Directions' 'objective and Subjective Elements of Provocation Under Crimes Act S 23']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trial judge erred in directing the jury that personal characteristics such as ethnic or cultural background should not be imputed to the 'ordinary person' for the objective test under s 23(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)" 'Whether the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal is bound by High Court decisions on provocation']
Ratio Decidendi
The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal is bound by established High Court authority that, for the objective test in s 23(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), characteristics such as the accused's ethnic or cultural background are not to be attributed to the ordinary person; it was correct for the trial judge to so direct the jury, and there is no basis for allowing the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment