Truckbug Pty Ltd v Blue Circle Southern Cement Ltd [2001] NSWIRComm 88
Jurisdiction existed because Truckbug bought a vehicle used in Blue Circle work, paid a substantial premium, Blue Circle did not show it had informed Truckbug that no premium was required, and the evidence established an established practice at the yard of trucks being sold at a premium with the buyer expecting access to the outgoing carrier's work. Clause 11 did not negate that conclusion. Compensation was justified, but because Truckbug had obtained work from Blue Circle and was in no small measure a factor in the souring of the relationship, the appropriate amount was $70,000 rather than the $115,000 claimed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Notification of Claim for Compensation by Truckbug Pty Ltd Pursuant to S348 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; compensation ordered in favour of Truckbug Pty Ltd.
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Carrier Compensation' 'sale of Vehicle With Work' 'premium or Goodwill Payment' 'custom and Practice' 'termination of Contract of Carriage' 'jurisdiction Under S346 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notification of Claim for Compensation by Truckbug Pty Ltd Pursuant to S348 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the jurisdictional requirements in s346(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 were satisfied.' "Whether there existed a custom and practice in the relevant section of the industry or Blue Circle's business that a premium or fee be paid for a truck sold with work." 'Whether cl.11 of the Transport Industry - General Carriers Contract Determination prevented recognition of such a custom and practice.' 'Whether compensation should be ordered and, if so, in what amount.']
Ratio Decidendi
Jurisdiction existed because Truckbug bought a vehicle used in Blue Circle work, paid a substantial premium, Blue Circle did not show it had informed Truckbug that no premium was required, and the evidence established an established practice at the yard of trucks being sold at a premium with the buyer expecting access to the outgoing carrier's work. Clause 11 did not negate that conclusion. Compensation was justified, but because Truckbug had obtained work from Blue Circle and was in no small measure a factor in the souring of the relationship, the appropriate amount was $70,000 rather than the $115,000 claimed.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; compensation ordered in favour of Truckbug Pty Ltd.
Orders
- ['The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $70,000.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment