Blue Fountain Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1640
The appeal is upheld and the modification to the development consent is granted as the modified development is substantially the same, all jurisdictional prerequisites are met and the parties have agreed under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Blue Fountain Pty Ltd; Respondent: Liverpool City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Modification (class 1) / Disposition After S 34 Agreement / Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; modification granted
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent Modification, Staging of Works, Jurisdictional Requirements, Conciliation Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Blue Fountain Pty Ltd
Applicant
Liverpool City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Modification (class 1) / Disposition After S 34 Agreement / Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the modification application meets the requirements of s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether the development as modified is substantially the same as originally approved
- 3 Whether relevant statutory and planning controls and notification requirements have been satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and the modification to the development consent is granted as the modified development is substantially the same, all jurisdictional prerequisites are met and the parties have agreed under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; modification granted
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Consent No. DA-698/2019 is modified in the terms set out in Annexure 'A'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment