Blue Mirror Pty Ltd v Tan & Tan Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 286
No exceptional circumstances justify the continuation of security for costs post-appeal, since the litigation in the Court is at an end, no application for special leave has yet been made, and no satisfactory explanation or grounds for such application has been offered. The successful litigant is entitled to release of the security provided, and to costs.
- Parties
- Appellant: Blue Mirror Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Tan & Tan Australia Pty Ltd (in liq); Second Respondent: Anthony Tan; Third Respondent: Australian Construction Company Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Costs and Security for Costs Post Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed on costs; security for costs released to the appellant; costs orders set aside and replaced in line with reasons given.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Security for Costs, Release of Security, Appeal Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Blue Mirror Pty Ltd
Appellant
Tan & Tan Australia Pty Ltd (in liq)
First Respondent
Anthony Tan
Second Respondent
Australian Construction Company Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Costs and Security for Costs Post Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be released following successful appeal
- 2 Whether costs orders should be altered or set aside post-appeal
Ratio Decidendi
No exceptional circumstances justify the continuation of security for costs post-appeal, since the litigation in the Court is at an end, no application for special leave has yet been made, and no satisfactory explanation or grounds for such application has been offered. The successful litigant is entitled to release of the security provided, and to costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed on costs; security for costs released to the appellant; costs orders set aside and replaced in line with reasons given.
Orders
- The second and third respondents pay the appellant's costs.
- Set aside order 3 made on 1 February 2024 in the court below insofar as it concerned costs between the plaintiff on the one hand and the fourth and fifth defendants on the other, and in lieu thereof order that the fourth and fifth defendants pay the plaintiff's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment