Bluejay Holdings Pty Limited v Valuer-General [2015] NSWLEC 1111

The Commissioner was satisfied that the parties' agreement was a decision the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, so the proceedings were required to be disposed of in accordance with that decision under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 23 March 2015
Procedural Posture: Class 3 Valuation Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders
Outcome: Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Legal Topics: ['land Value' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']

['valuation' 'land and Environment Court Procedure'] ['land Value' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Class 3 Valuation Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the agreement reached between the parties at or after the conciliation conference was a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.

Orders

["Final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on 23 March 2015."]