BlueScope Steel Limited v. Australian Workers Union, Electrical Trades Union and Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2008] NSWIRComm 1039
The Commission was satisfied on the evidence that BlueScope Steel's CPCM restructuring proposal could be implemented safely, was not shown to be illegal, did not require CPCM operators to perform work outside the scope of their employment, and did not place unreasonable or unfair demands on employees. Questions of efficiency were primarily for BlueScope Steel management, and individual employee impacts could be addressed separately. The unions did not establish grounds to preserve the status quo, so the status quo was revoked and BlueScope Steel was permitted to proceed toward implementation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Notification of Industrial Dispute Under S.130 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 and Referral of an Industrial Dispute Under S.146 a of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 Concerning Proposed Restructuring of Maintenance Operations for the Coupled Pickled Cold Mill / Arbitration After Conciliation Failed and a Certificate of Attempted Conciliation Was Issued
- Outcome
- Status quo revoked; BlueScope Steel's restructuring proposal approved for implementation discussions.
- Legal Topics
- ['industrial Dispute' 'manning Levels' 'restructuring of Maintenance Operations' 'dispute Settling Procedure' 'status Quo Pending Dispute Resolution' 'workplace Safety' 'fairness of Proposed Change' 'efficiency of Operations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notification of Industrial Dispute Under S.130 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 and Referral of an Industrial Dispute Under S.146 a of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 Concerning Proposed Restructuring of Maintenance Operations for the Coupled Pickled Cold Mill / Arbitration After Conciliation Failed and a Certificate of Attempted Conciliation Was Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether BlueScope Steel's proposed restructuring of CPCM maintenance operations should be permitted and the status quo revoked" 'Whether the proposed changes were safe, efficient, legal and fair within Clause 36.4.1(c) of the BlueScope Steel Award' 'Whether CPCM production operators would be required to perform work outside the scope of their employment or without appropriate training or accreditation' 'Whether the removal or reduction of shift trades personnel and trades assistants would create occupational health and safety risks' 'Whether any unfairness to employees from retrenchment, transfer from shift work to day work, loss of earnings or changed duties justified maintaining the status quo']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission was satisfied on the evidence that BlueScope Steel's CPCM restructuring proposal could be implemented safely, was not shown to be illegal, did not require CPCM operators to perform work outside the scope of their employment, and did not place unreasonable or unfair demands on employees. Questions of efficiency were primarily for BlueScope Steel management, and individual employee impacts could be addressed separately. The unions did not establish grounds to preserve the status quo, so the status quo was revoked and BlueScope Steel was permitted to proceed toward implementation.
Court Disposition
Status quo revoked; BlueScope Steel's restructuring proposal approved for implementation discussions.
Orders
- ['The status quo which had been in place was revoked.' 'BlueScope Steel, the AWU, the ETU and the AFMEPKIU should hold further discussions with a view to implementation of the proposal at the earliest possible opportunity.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment