Bluescope Steel Limited v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2005] FCA 3

Bluescope Steel Limited v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2005] FCA 3

Notice of industrial action by fax constitutes written notice within the meaning of s 170MO(2)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act, and inclusion of an impermissible claim in the initiating notice does not invalidate the bargaining period; thus, no serious issue to be tried justifies granting an interlocutory injunction.

Parties
Applicant: Bluescope Steel Limited; First Respondent: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia; Second Respondent: Mark Farrell
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Decision
Outcome
Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Protected Industrial Action, Service of Written Notice, Employer/employee Relationship Claims, Workplace Bargaining Period

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bluescope Steel Limited

Applicant

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

First Respondent

Mark Farrell

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Decision

  1. 1 Whether notice by fax constitutes written notice under s 170MO(2)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act
  2. 2 Whether notification was invalid due to impermissible claim
  3. 3 Whether a bargaining period existed

Ratio Decidendi

Notice of industrial action by fax constitutes written notice within the meaning of s 170MO(2)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act, and inclusion of an impermissible claim in the initiating notice does not invalidate the bargaining period; thus, no serious issue to be tried justifies granting an interlocutory injunction.

Court Disposition

Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed.

Orders

  • The application for an interlocutory injunction is dismissed.