BMW Australia Finance Ltd v Mehajer Vision Pty Ltd (No2) [2021] NSWSC 1379
The court was satisfied on the evidentiary material that BMW had a first ranking, registered security interest under a chattel mortgage, and that Mehajer Vision had no legal basis for its claimed interest. Thus, BMW was entitled to declaratory and other relief, including possession and sale of the vehicle, and removal of the PPSR registration by Mehajer Vision.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: BMW Australia Finance Ltd; First Defendant: Mehajer Vision Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Registrar of Personal Property Securities
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Consent Orders Granted at Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders made by consent in favour of the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Priority of Interests, Security Interests, Personal Property Securities Act, Declaratory Relief, Possession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BMW Australia Finance Ltd
Plaintiff
Mehajer Vision Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Registrar of Personal Property Securities
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Consent Orders Granted at Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether BMW Australia Finance Ltd is entitled to possession and sale of the Ferrari motor vehicle under the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth)
- 2 Whether Mehajer Vision Pty Ltd had a valid security interest in the Ferrari
- 3 Priority of interests between registered and unregistered (or later registered) security interests under the PPSA
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied on the evidentiary material that BMW had a first ranking, registered security interest under a chattel mortgage, and that Mehajer Vision had no legal basis for its claimed interest. Thus, BMW was entitled to declaratory and other relief, including possession and sale of the vehicle, and removal of the PPSR registration by Mehajer Vision.
Court Disposition
Orders made by consent in favour of the plaintiff.
Orders
- The Plaintiff is entitled to possession of a 2011 Ferrari 458 ITA Coupe motor vehicle (Engine No. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, VIN No. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX);
- The Plaintiff is entitled to sell the vehicle;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment