BN v Hornsby Shire Council [2012] NSWADT 165
The respondent's publication of the Deputy Ombudsman's letter and internal report containing BN's personal information on its website constituted a contravention of the disclosure information protection principle in s 18(2) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998, as the information was not otherwise publicly available nor was public disclosure authorised by the Ombudsman Act 1974 provision relied upon; no compensation was ordered due to lack of evidence of loss.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- External Review (privacy) / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Orders made for apology and directions regarding future compliance, no compensation ordered, costs reserved
- Legal Topics
- ['personal Information' 'disclosure of Personal Information' 'information Protection Principles' 'use of Personal Information']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
External Review (privacy) / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether information in the Deputy Ombudsman's letter to BN is 'personal information' about BN under section 4(1) of the PPIP Act; and not excluded by the exceptions in section 4(3)" "Whether the respondent's publication of the Deputy Ombudsman's letter constituted a breach of the disclosure information protection principles in sections 16, 17, and 18 of the PPIP Act" 'Whether any order for compensation or other remedy should be made against the respondent']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's publication of the Deputy Ombudsman's letter and internal report containing BN's personal information on its website constituted a contravention of the disclosure information protection principle in s 18(2) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998, as the information was not otherwise publicly available nor was public disclosure authorised by the Ombudsman Act 1974 provision relied upon; no compensation was ordered due to lack of evidence of loss.
Court Disposition
Orders made for apology and directions regarding future compliance, no compensation ordered, costs reserved
Orders
- ["Within 28 days of this decision, respondent to provide BN with a written apology for conduct contravening s 18(2) of the PPIP Act via website publication of the Deputy Ombudsman's letter and the report GM5/11 to the extent it contained BN's personal information." 'Respondent to take all necessary steps to ensure...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment