Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining & Energy Union v Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 719
The second applicant's preparatory steps before the notified commencement times were not protected industrial action and were not authorised or agreed to by the respondent. The proper comparison was with the work he would customarily have performed at those times if not taking protected industrial action, which was continuing to operate the dozer. By parking up and making the dozer safe before the notified commencement times, he performed work differently from the customary manner and thereby engaged in non-protected industrial action. Section 474(1)(b) therefore required the respondent not to pay him for four hours on each relevant day, and the application had to be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Work Division Proceeding Concerning Alleged Improper Pay Deductions for Industrial Action / Originating Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['industrial Action' 'protected Industrial Action' 'pay Deductions' 'employer Authorisation of Employee Action' 'fair Work Act 2009 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Fair Work Division Proceeding Concerning Alleged Improper Pay Deductions for Industrial Action / Originating Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether steps taken by the second applicant before the notified commencement times of protected industrial action to park, secure and make safe a dozer constituted industrial action under s 19(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).' 'Whether those steps were excluded from industrial action because they were authorised or agreed to by the employer under s 19(2)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).' "Whether the respondent was required by s 474(1)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to deduct four hours' pay for each relevant day."]
Ratio Decidendi
The second applicant's preparatory steps before the notified commencement times were not protected industrial action and were not authorised or agreed to by the respondent. The proper comparison was with the work he would customarily have performed at those times if not taking protected industrial action, which was continuing to operate the dozer. By parking up and making the dozer safe before the notified commencement times, he performed work differently from the customary manner and thereby engaged in non-protected industrial action. Section 474(1)(b) therefore required the respondent not to pay him for four hours on each relevant day, and the application had to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The originating application be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment