Bolnisi Gold NL, in the matter of Bolnisi Gold NL [2007] FCA 1668
The requirements of ss 411 and 412 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for convening a meeting of shareholders to consider a scheme of arrangement are satisfied, including disclosure, independent expert support, and ASIC notice, and none of the identified features of the scheme (condition subsequent, break fee, exclusivity, warranty) preclude such an order. The presence of a later, certain, self-executing condition subsequent does not prevent the court from making orders convening a meeting. The evidence supports that the Scheme Booklet is sufficient and other procedural requirements are met.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bolnisi Gold NL; Other Party: Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement Application / First Court Hearing (order for Scheme Meeting)
- Outcome
- Order for meeting to be convened granted
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Cash and Scrip Consideration, Condition Subsequent, No Shop Provision, Break Fee Provision, Foreign Investment Review Board, Deemed Warranty, Exclusivity in Merger Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bolnisi Gold NL
Plaintiff
Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation
Other Party
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Application / First Court Hearing (order for Scheme Meeting)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders should be made for convening a meeting of Bolnisi Gold NL members to consider a scheme of arrangement
- 2 Whether the explanatory statement (Scheme Booklet) should be approved
- 3 Whether the condition subsequent of a Canadian law plan of arrangement affects the ability to order the scheme meeting
Ratio Decidendi
The requirements of ss 411 and 412 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for convening a meeting of shareholders to consider a scheme of arrangement are satisfied, including disclosure, independent expert support, and ASIC notice, and none of the identified features of the scheme (condition subsequent, break fee, exclusivity, warranty) preclude such an order. The presence of a later, certain, self-executing condition subsequent does not prevent the court from making orders convening a meeting. The evidence supports that the Scheme Booklet is sufficient and other procedural requirements are met.
Court Disposition
Order for meeting to be convened granted
Orders
- Plaintiff to convene a meeting of its members to consider and, if thought fit, approve the scheme of arrangement between Bolnisi Gold NL and its shareholders
- Scheme Booklet approved for distribution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment