The Elusive [2010] NSWSC 525

The Elusive [2010] NSWSC 525

The plaintiff, as mortgagee under a chattel mortgage granted by Trelat Pty Limited (in liquidation), is entitled to possession of the vessel following default caused by Trelat's liquidation. Evidence established that Trelat was the legal owner of the vessel from 30 April 2009, and the mortgage was valid notwithstanding the absence of ship registration or a bill of sale. Mr Druce's assertions of ownership or estoppel were unsupported by evidence. No leave was required under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as the plaintiff was a secured creditor. The legal and beneficial ownership vested in the plaintiff, subject to the equity of redemption.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Determination at First Instance
Outcome
Orders made for possession and sale of the vessel to the plaintiff as mortgagee in possession; defendants to pay costs; notifications regarding proceeds of sale to be made and the ship to be released from arrest upon payment or arrangement for costs.
Legal Topics
['ship Arrest' 'mortgagee Possession' 'chattel Mortgage' 'ownership of Ships' 'registration of Ships' 'effect of Security Interests Legislation' 'necessity of Leave Under Corporations Law']
['admiralty' 'equity' 'shipping Law'] ['ship Arrest' 'mortgagee Possession' 'chattel Mortgage' 'ownership of Ships' 'registration of Ships' 'effect of Security Interests Legislation' 'necessity of Leave Under Corporations Law']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Principal Judgment / Determination at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff is entitled to possession of the vessel under the chattel mortgage' 'Whether Trelat Pty Ltd was the owner of the vessel and could give the plaintiff security' 'Whether leave was required for in rem or in personam proceedings pursuant to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether absence of registration affects the chattel mortgage' "Whether the Security Interests in Goods Act 2005 (NSW) and Registration of Interests in Goods Act 1986 (NSW) affect the plaintiff's interests"]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff, as mortgagee under a chattel mortgage granted by Trelat Pty Limited (in liquidation), is entitled to possession of the vessel following default caused by Trelat's liquidation. Evidence established that Trelat was the legal owner of the vessel from 30 April 2009, and the mortgage was valid notwithstanding the absence of ship registration or a bill of sale. Mr Druce's assertions of ownership or estoppel were unsupported by evidence. No leave was required under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as the plaintiff was a secured creditor. The legal and beneficial ownership vested in the plaintiff, subject to the equity of redemption.

Court Disposition

Orders made for possession and sale of the vessel to the plaintiff as mortgagee in possession; defendants to pay costs; notifications regarding proceeds of sale to be made and the ship to be released from arrest upon payment or arrangement for costs.

Orders

  • ["Plaintiff have possession of the ship 'Elusive' (marine registration AFJ852N)" 'Upon payment to the Admiralty Marshal or satisfactory arrangements for arrest costs, the ship be released from arrest and delivered into the plaintiff’s possession' "Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs of the proceedings (including...