Environment Protection Authority v Boral Resources (QLD) Pty Limited [2001] NSWLEC 22

Environment Protection Authority v Boral Resources (QLD) Pty Limited [2001] NSWLEC 22

Where no environmental harm is demonstrated, and the defendant had control and foreseeability but failed to implement preventative measures, a penalty discounted for guilty plea but consistent with similar cases is appropriate.

Parties
Prosecutor: Environment Protection Authority; Defendant: Boral Resources (QLD) Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing
Outcome
Defendant found guilty and sentenced to pay a monetary penalty.
Legal Topics
Environmental Offences, Water Pollution, Sentencing, Penalties
Environmental Law Criminal Law Environmental Offences Water Pollution Sentencing Penalties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Environment Protection Authority

Prosecutor

Boral Resources (QLD) Pty Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate penalty for water pollution offence under Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989 and Clean Waters Act 1970 s 16(1)
  2. 2 Consideration of harm, foreseeability, control, mitigation, and contrition in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

Where no environmental harm is demonstrated, and the defendant had control and foreseeability but failed to implement preventative measures, a penalty discounted for guilty plea but consistent with similar cases is appropriate.

Court Disposition

Defendant found guilty and sentenced to pay a monetary penalty.

Orders

  • Defendant found guilty of the offence as charged.
  • Defendant must pay a penalty of $5,000 for the offence.