Borden Australia Pty Ltd v Monsanto Australia Ltd [1983] FCA 428
The interrogatories to which objection was taken were disallowed because they were either not relevant to issues between the parties, were oppressive or vexatious to answer, or required the respondent to determine questions of law or mixed fact and law rather than facts within its knowledge.
- Parties
- Applicant: Borden Australia Pty. Limited; Respondent: Monsanto Australia Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Application for Orders for Answers to Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as to the disputed interrogatories; costs order made in favour of respondent
- Legal Topics
- Interrogatories, Price Discrimination, Trade Practices Act 1974, Oppression of Discovery, Relevance of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Borden Australia Pty. Limited
Applicant
Monsanto Australia Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Application for Orders for Answers to Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interrogatories to which objection was taken relate to matters in issue between the parties
- 2 Whether answering the interrogatories would be oppressive or vexatious
- 3 Scope and relevance of interrogatories in competition law proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The interrogatories to which objection was taken were disallowed because they were either not relevant to issues between the parties, were oppressive or vexatious to answer, or required the respondent to determine questions of law or mixed fact and law rather than facts within its knowledge.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as to the disputed interrogatories; costs order made in favour of respondent
Orders
- All interrogatories to which objection was taken are disallowed.
- Applicant to pay the respondent's costs of the Notice of Motion of 8 April 1983 insofar as it relates to the orders sought in paragraph 1.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment