CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and HORNETT v BORG MANUFACTURING PTY LTD [1997] IRCA 14
Regulation 30B did not apply because there was no determination in advance that Mr Hornett's employment was probationary, either by express or implied agreement, nor by operation of the enterprise flexibility agreement, which came into force after employment commenced.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of Judicial Registrar's Decision Under S 170 EA Workplace Relations Act 1996 / Judicial Review; Reasons for Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Order of Judicial Registrar dismissing the application under s 170EA is set aside; application remitted for hearing and determination.
- Legal Topics
- ['termination of Employment' 'probationary Employment' 'enterprise Flexibility Agreement' 'application of Exclusionary Regulations to Employment' 'power to Determine Date of Operation of Agreements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Judicial Registrar's Decision Under S 170 EA Workplace Relations Act 1996 / Judicial Review; Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Hornett was a probationary employee with a period of probation determined in advance' 'Whether the employment contract was governed by an enterprise flexibility agreement made after employment commenced' "Whether regulation 30B excluded the applicant's protections under Division 3 of Part VIA" 'Whether the Australian Industrial Relations Commission had power to specify an earlier date of commencement for the agreement']
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 30B did not apply because there was no determination in advance that Mr Hornett's employment was probationary, either by express or implied agreement, nor by operation of the enterprise flexibility agreement, which came into force after employment commenced.
Court Disposition
Order of Judicial Registrar dismissing the application under s 170EA is set aside; application remitted for hearing and determination.
Orders
- ['The order of the Judicial Registrar of 19 September 1996 dismissing the application under s 170EA is set aside.' 'The application under s 170EA is remitted to a Judicial Registrar for hearing and determination.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment