Chaar v The Owners – Strata Plan 57161 [2024] NSWCATAP 242
The application was lodged out of time, beyond the two-year limitation period imposed by s 106(6) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). The error in dates in the first instance decision did not affect the outcome since the limitation period expired before the application was filed. There was no basis for granting leave to appeal, and no question of law was raised.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bouad Chaar; Respondent: The Owners – Strata Plan 57161
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strata Title, Limitation Period, Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bouad Chaar
Appellant
The Owners – Strata Plan 57161
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred as to material facts and dates
- 2 Whether the two-year limitation period barred the claim under s 106(6) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)
- 3 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The application was lodged out of time, beyond the two-year limitation period imposed by s 106(6) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). The error in dates in the first instance decision did not affect the outcome since the limitation period expired before the application was filed. There was no basis for granting leave to appeal, and no question of law was raised.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal is refused.
- The appeal is otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment