Bowen Energy Limited v 2KD Drilling Pty Limited [2009] FCA 796
The plaintiff having succeeded in obtaining an order to set aside the statutory demand is entitled to its costs, but not to indemnity costs; the costs issue does not depend on the merits of the underlying substantive dispute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Post Hearing, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to plaintiff, indemnity costs refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Post Hearing, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the defendant should pay the plaintiff's costs after statutory demand set aside by consent"]
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff having succeeded in obtaining an order to set aside the statutory demand is entitled to its costs, but not to indemnity costs; the costs issue does not depend on the merits of the underlying substantive dispute.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to plaintiff, indemnity costs refused.
Orders
- ["The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of this proceeding."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment