BPG Holdings (No. 5) Pty Limited v Northern Beaches Council [2022] NSWLEC 1220
The modification application was approved because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make: the modified development was substantially the same as the originally approved seniors living development, the changes were to pedestrian access and ancillary built form aspects, the development remained six dwellings, the increase in floor space was marginal, notification requirements had been met, submissions had been considered, and the relevant planning provisions continued to be satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Modification Application to Modify a Court Granted Development Consent for Seniors Living / Orders Made Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Application granted; Modification application No. MOD2021/0873 approved.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'seniors Living Housing' 'conciliation Conference' 'court Approval of Agreed Orders' 'environmental Planning Instruments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Modification Application to Modify a Court Granted Development Consent for Seniors Living / Orders Made Following Agreement Reached at a Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should grant Modification application No. MOD2021/0873 to modify a Court-granted development consent pursuant to s 4.55(8) and s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether the development as modified was substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted.' 'Whether notification requirements and consideration of submissions under s 4.55(2)(c) and s 4.55(2)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 were satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
The modification application was approved because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make: the modified development was substantially the same as the originally approved seniors living development, the changes were to pedestrian access and ancillary built form aspects, the development remained six dwellings, the increase in floor space was marginal, notification requirements had been met, submissions had been considered, and the relevant planning provisions continued to be satisfied.
Court Disposition
Application granted; Modification application No. MOD2021/0873 approved.
Orders
- ['The application is granted.' 'Pursuant to section 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Modification application No. MOD2021/0873 for amendments to the footprint and setbacks of units G03 and G04, the roof form of the development and the replacement of the pedestrian refuge island with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment