BQU v Children’s Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 121
The Tribunal was not positively satisfied that the applicant would not repeat his offending conduct. Weighing evidence of rehabilitation against unresolved concerns about risk factors and taking into account the paramount consideration of child safety, the applicant was found to pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children. The decision under review was affirmed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Decision under review affirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'risk Assessment' 'professional Misconduct' 'sexual Misconduct' 'grooming']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children' "Correct and preferable decision in review of Children's Guardian's refusal to grant working with children clearance"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was not positively satisfied that the applicant would not repeat his offending conduct. Weighing evidence of rehabilitation against unresolved concerns about risk factors and taking into account the paramount consideration of child safety, the applicant was found to pose a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children. The decision under review was affirmed.
Court Disposition
Decision under review affirmed
Orders
- ['The decision under review is affirmed' "Orders prohibiting publication or disclosure of the applicant's name or identifying information under s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment