Campbell v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2017] FCA 1509
The tribunal correctly determined, and the respondent (CSC) was lawfully entitled and required to furnish, the annual pension amount information to the applicant in accordance with reg 63 of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001 and the MSBS Determination as amended in 2016. The Minister's determination permissibly required overlapping information such as the annual pension amount ('P') to be disclosed. There was no prohibition or legal error in the Tribunal's affirmation of the CSC's decision subject to specific regulatory reference.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Tribunal
- Outcome
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['superannuation Splitting' 'provision of Information by Superannuation Trustee' 'military Superannuation Benefits Scheme' 'invalidity Pension' 'tribunal Decision Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent (CSC) was obliged or entitled to furnish the applicant with information about the annual pension amount of invalidity pension paid under the Military Superannuation Benefits Scheme (MSBS)' "Whether the Tribunal erred in affirming – subject to correction of the reference to the applicable regulation – the respondent's decision to furnish such information in a certificate to the applicant" 'Construction and effect of reg 63 of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001 and the MSBS Determination as amended in 2016']
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal correctly determined, and the respondent (CSC) was lawfully entitled and required to furnish, the annual pension amount information to the applicant in accordance with reg 63 of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001 and the MSBS Determination as amended in 2016. The Minister's determination permissibly required overlapping information such as the annual pension amount ('P') to be disclosed. There was no prohibition or legal error in the Tribunal's affirmation of the CSC's decision subject to specific regulatory reference.
Court Disposition
The appeal is dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment