Henry & Ors v Hazzard [2021] NSWSC 1218
The subpoena served on the Proper Officer of the Department of Premier and Cabinet does not have a proper forensic purpose, particularly given the Premier is not a party, the issue is one of law (not fact), and set against the context of urgent case preparation, it is inappropriate to require compliance with such a subpoena.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Natasha Henry; Second Plaintiff: Selina Crowe; Third Plaintiff: Julie Ramos; Fourth Plaintiff: Hohepa Waapu; Fifth Plaintiff: Kamran Khan; Sixth Plaintiff: Sandi Greiner; Defendant: Bradley Hazzard
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural Ruling / Interlocutory Application – Motion to Set Aside Subpoena
- Outcome
- Subpoena set aside
- Legal Topics
- Subpoena, Forensic Purpose, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Natasha Henry
First Plaintiff
Selina Crowe
Second Plaintiff
Julie Ramos
Third Plaintiff
Hohepa Waapu
Fourth Plaintiff
Kamran Khan
Fifth Plaintiff
Sandi Greiner
Sixth Plaintiff
Bradley Hazzard
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Procedural Ruling / Interlocutory Application – Motion to Set Aside Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subpoena directed to the Department of Premier and Cabinet has proper forensic purpose
- 2 Whether alleged admission by the Premier is relevant to the issues in the case
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoena served on the Proper Officer of the Department of Premier and Cabinet does not have a proper forensic purpose, particularly given the Premier is not a party, the issue is one of law (not fact), and set against the context of urgent case preparation, it is inappropriate to require compliance with such a subpoena.
Court Disposition
Subpoena set aside
Orders
- The subpoena addressed to the Proper Officer of the Department of Premier and Cabinet is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment