Campbell v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2016] FCA 808
The applicant's entitlement to receive an invalidity pension benefit under the Military Superannuation Benefits Scheme is a superannuation interest as defined by s 90MD Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) but, under reg 5(2) of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001, the invalidity pension is not a defined benefit interest but an accumulation interest; thus, the trustee was obliged to provide information on the basis of an accumulation interest, not a defined benefit interest, and the Tribunal erred in upholding the provision of information on the defined benefit basis.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bradley James Campbell; First Respondent: Superannuation Complaints Tribunal; Second Respondent: Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal on Questions of Law From Tribunal Decision / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed on questions of law. Tribunal decision set aside. Matter remitted for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Invalidity Pension, Defined Benefit Interest, Superannuation Interest, Obligation to Furnish Information Under S 90 MZB Family Law Act, Value of Superannuation Interests, Family Law (superannuation) Regulations Interpretation, Military Superannuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bradley James Campbell
Applicant
Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
First Respondent
Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal on Questions of Law From Tribunal Decision / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's entitlement to an invalidity pension benefit under the Military Superannuation Benefits Scheme is a 'superannuation interest' as defined by s 90MD Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the entitlement to an invalidity pension is a 'defined benefit interest' for the purposes of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001
- 3 Whether the trustee (second respondent) was obliged to provide information on a defined benefit or accumulation interest basis under s 90MZB(3) Family Law Act
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's entitlement to receive an invalidity pension benefit under the Military Superannuation Benefits Scheme is a superannuation interest as defined by s 90MD Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) but, under reg 5(2) of the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2001, the invalidity pension is not a defined benefit interest but an accumulation interest; thus, the trustee was obliged to provide information on the basis of an accumulation interest, not a defined benefit interest, and the Tribunal erred in upholding the provision of information on the defined benefit basis.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed on questions of law. Tribunal decision set aside. Matter remitted for reconsideration.
Orders
- The applicant's invalidity pension under the Military Superannuation Benefit Scheme is a superannuation interest for the purposes of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
- The applicant ought to have been furnished with information on the footing that the interest was an accumulation interest and not a defined benefit interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment