BRANDI V. MINGOT

BRANDI V. MINGOT

The damages awarded were unreasonably low given the medical evidence and incurred losses, and the jury likely failed to properly consider future loss of earning capacity due to inadequate judicial directions; a new trial on damages is required.

Parties
Appellant: Brandi; Respondent: Mingot
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 November 1976
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Full Court of Supreme Court of Victoria Judgment on Quantum of Damages in Personal Injury Claim
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Judgment of Full Court of Supreme Court of Victoria set aside. New trial on damages ordered.
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Damages Assessment, Jury Directions, New Trial
Tort Personal Injury Damages Assessment Jury Directions New Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brandi

Appellant

Mingot

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Full Court of Supreme Court of Victoria Judgment on Quantum of Damages in Personal Injury Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the damages awarded by the jury were so unreasonably low as to require intervention and a new trial limited to damages
  2. 2 Whether jury had been misdirected as to the consequences of failure to call certain medical evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The damages awarded were unreasonably low given the medical evidence and incurred losses, and the jury likely failed to properly consider future loss of earning capacity due to inadequate judicial directions; a new trial on damages is required.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Judgment of Full Court of Supreme Court of Victoria set aside. New trial on damages ordered.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs.
  • Judgment of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria set aside.