Subota v Boskovic [2013] NSWDC 259

Subota v Boskovic [2013] NSWDC 259

The subpoena did not require production of originals, and the evidence did not establish that NAB failed to comply with the subpoena. Accordingly, the application for an order against NAB was refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application
Outcome
defendant's application dismissed
Legal Topics
['subpoena' 'production of Documents' 'third Party Compliance' 'interlocutory Application']
['civil Procedure'] ['subpoena' 'production of Documents' 'third Party Compliance' 'interlocutory Application']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether National Australia Bank complied with the subpoena for production of documents' 'Whether orders should be made against National Australia Bank for alleged non-compliance with the subpoena']

Ratio Decidendi

The subpoena did not require production of originals, and the evidence did not establish that NAB failed to comply with the subpoena. Accordingly, the application for an order against NAB was refused.

Court Disposition

defendant's application dismissed

Orders

  • ["Defendant's application regarding National Australia Bank's compliance with subpoena refused."]