Brazin Limited v Transarea China Ltd [2007] FCA 753

Brazin Limited v Transarea China Ltd [2007] FCA 753

Default judgment was appropriate as the first defendant failed to comply with court orders and did not appear, justifying entry of judgment for the plaintiff including interest and costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Default Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant
Legal Topics
['default Judgment' 'costs' 'transfer of Proceeding']
['civil Procedure'] ['default Judgment' 'costs' 'transfer of Proceeding']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the first defendant complied with previous court orders' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to default judgment against the first defendant']

Ratio Decidendi

Default judgment was appropriate as the first defendant failed to comply with court orders and did not appear, justifying entry of judgment for the plaintiff including interest and costs.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant

Orders

  • ['Judgment be entered for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the amount of $22,033.79 including interest in accordance with s 51A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976.' "The first defendant pay the plaintiff's costs, including the costs in the proceeding in the Federal Magistrates Court."]