Capital Foods Pty Ltd (ACN 008 107 382) and Anor v Gourmet Imports Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 060 783 315) and Anor [1996] FCA 979
There was, on affidavit evidence, a contract making the first applicant exclusive distributor of Cannamela's products in Australia until 31 December 1996, and that contract was breached. Judgment entered for the first applicant for damages to be assessed. Second respondent's cross-claim dismissed for failure to appear and prosecute its case.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Capital Foods Pty Ltd (ACN 008 107 382); Second Applicant: Brands Pty Ltd (ACN 060 783 315); First Respondent and First Cross Applicant: Gourmet Imports Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 072 232 476); Second Respondent and Second Cross Applicant: Cannamela SRL; First Cross Respondent to Second Cross Application: Capital Foods Pty Ltd (ACN 008 107 382); Second Cross Respondent to Second Cross Application: Brands Pty Ltd (ACN 060 783 315)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Interlocutory, Judgment on Claims and Cross Claims
- Outcome
- Judgment for the first applicant against the second respondent for breach of contract; cross-claim by second respondent dismissed; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Exclusive Distributor Agreement, Security for Costs, Dismissal for Non Appearance, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Capital Foods Pty Ltd (ACN 008 107 382)
First Applicant
Brands Pty Ltd (ACN 060 783 315)
Second Applicant
Gourmet Imports Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 072 232 476)
First Respondent and First Cross Applicant
Cannamela SRL
Second Respondent and Second Cross Applicant
Capital Foods Pty Ltd (ACN 008 107 382)
First Cross Respondent to Second Cross Application
Brands Pty Ltd (ACN 060 783 315)
Second Cross Respondent to Second Cross Application
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Interlocutory, Judgment on Claims and Cross Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a contract appointing Capital Foods Pty Ltd as exclusive distributor for Cannamela SRL in Australia until 31 December 1996.
- 2 Whether Cannamela SRL breached that contract.
- 3 Whether the second respondent's cross-claim should be dismissed for failure to appear or comply with security for costs order.
Ratio Decidendi
There was, on affidavit evidence, a contract making the first applicant exclusive distributor of Cannamela's products in Australia until 31 December 1996, and that contract was breached. Judgment entered for the first applicant for damages to be assessed. Second respondent's cross-claim dismissed for failure to appear and prosecute its case.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the first applicant against the second respondent for breach of contract; cross-claim by second respondent dismissed; costs orders made.
Orders
- Second cross-claim dismissed under O32 r2(1)(c) Federal Court Rules.
- Second cross-claimant (Cannamela SRL) to pay applicants' costs on the cross-claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment