Brennock & Dixon v Norman [2021] NSWSC 716
Articles naming Mr Dixon and Mr Brennock or explicitly identifying them conveyed imputations of fraud and misleading marketing of and concerning the plaintiffs, breaching the injunctions beyond reasonable doubt and constituting contempt; articles not naming or sufficiently identifying did not prove contempt.
- Parties
- Second Plaintiff: Adrian Brennock; Third Plaintiff: Phillip Dixon; First Defendant: Gillian Linda Norman
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Contempt / Liability Determination
- Outcome
- Contempt partially established; findings made on liability in respect of specified articles; orders deferred pending submissions on penalty and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Injunctions, Identification in Defamation, Standard of Proof, Civil Contempt Elements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adrian Brennock
Second Plaintiff
Phillip Dixon
Third Plaintiff
Gillian Linda Norman
First Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Contempt / Liability Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether impugned publications were of and concerning the plaintiffs
- 2 Whether publications breached permanent injunctions restraining defamatory imputations
- 3 Whether contempt is proven beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
Articles naming Mr Dixon and Mr Brennock or explicitly identifying them conveyed imputations of fraud and misleading marketing of and concerning the plaintiffs, breaching the injunctions beyond reasonable doubt and constituting contempt; articles not naming or sufficiently identifying did not prove contempt.
Court Disposition
Contempt partially established; findings made on liability in respect of specified articles; orders deferred pending submissions on penalty and costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment