R v Innes [2020] NSWDC 878
Aggregate sentence fixed at six years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years was appropriate, reflecting the objective seriousness, the offender's criminal history, prospects of rehabilitation, subjective circumstances including social disadvantage and drug addiction, and a discount for an early guilty plea.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown); Offender: James Darren Innes
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of 6 years imprisonment imposed with non-parole period of 4 years. Offender referred to Drug Court.
- Legal Topics
- Break and Enter, Sentencing, Property Offences, Aggregate Sentence, Non Parole Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Prosecutor
James Darren Innes
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for multiple break and enter offences under s 112(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
- 2 Assessment of objective seriousness and subjective factors in sentencing
- 3 Application of aggregate sentencing provisions
Ratio Decidendi
Aggregate sentence fixed at six years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years was appropriate, reflecting the objective seriousness, the offender's criminal history, prospects of rehabilitation, subjective circumstances including social disadvantage and drug addiction, and a discount for an early guilty plea.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of 6 years imprisonment imposed with non-parole period of 4 years. Offender referred to Drug Court.
Orders
- Offender convicted of five break, enter and steal offences.
- Aggregate sentence of 6 years imprisonment with non-parole period of 4 years imposed, commencing 4 November 2019 and expiring 3 November 2025. Non-parole period expires 3 November 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment