Wick v R [2017] NSWCCA 244
The jury was entitled to find that the injuries sustained by the victim, including multiple full-thickness lacerations requiring over 100 stitches and nerve damage requiring microsurgery, constituted grievous bodily harm. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the objective and subjective factors.
- Parties
- Applicant: Brendan Luke Wick; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence appeals dismissed; leave to appeal sentence granted
- Legal Topics
- Recklessly Cause Grievous Bodily Harm, Manifest Excess in Sentencing, Reasonableness of Verdict, Legal Definition of Grievous Bodily Harm
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brendan Luke Wick
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the verdict of guilty of recklessly causing grievous bodily harm was unreasonable
- 2 Whether the evidence supported a finding of grievous bodily harm
- 3 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The jury was entitled to find that the injuries sustained by the victim, including multiple full-thickness lacerations requiring over 100 stitches and nerve damage requiring microsurgery, constituted grievous bodily harm. The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the objective and subjective factors.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence appeals dismissed; leave to appeal sentence granted
Orders
- The appeal against conviction is dismissed.
- Leave is granted to appeal against sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment