Singh v R [2015] NSWCCA 257
The withdrawal of the original aggravated robbery charge and its replacement with summary charges carrying much lower maximum penalties was a substantial change in circumstances. Together with the applicant's age, absence of prior convictions, first period in custody, close family support, and the likely period in custody before finalisation, it established cause under s. 16A. Although release raised bail concerns, principally for the safety of the victim and Crown witnesses, those concerns could be appropriately addressed by conditions including residence with parents, curfew, monitoring, non-contact conditions, passport surrender, and surety.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Bail Release Application Under S. 49 of the Bail Act 2013 (nsw). / Second Application for Release; Heard De Novo in the Court of Criminal Appeal After a Previous Application Was Refused by Wilson J on 5 August 2015.
- Outcome
- Application for release granted; applicant released on bail with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['release Application' 'show Cause Requirement' 'unacceptable Risk Test' 'bail Concerns' 'bail Conditions' 'change in Charges']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Bail Release Application Under S. 49 of the Bail Act 2013 (nsw). / Second Application for Release; Heard De Novo in the Court of Criminal Appeal After a Previous Application Was Refused by Wilson J on 5 August 2015.
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant had shown cause under s. 16A of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) why his detention was not justified.' 'Whether the withdrawal of the aggravated robbery charge and substitution of less serious charges constituted a material change strengthening the release application.' 'Whether any bail concerns, particularly concern for the safety of the victim and other Crown witnesses, could be addressed by conditions rather than refusal of bail.']
Ratio Decidendi
The withdrawal of the original aggravated robbery charge and its replacement with summary charges carrying much lower maximum penalties was a substantial change in circumstances. Together with the applicant's age, absence of prior convictions, first period in custody, close family support, and the likely period in custody before finalisation, it established cause under s. 16A. Although release raised bail concerns, principally for the safety of the victim and Crown witnesses, those concerns could be appropriately addressed by conditions including residence with parents, curfew, monitoring, non-contact conditions, passport surrender, and surety.
Court Disposition
Application for release granted; applicant released on bail with conditions.
Orders
- ['The application for release is granted.' 'The applicant is to be released on the conditions set out in [2] above.' 'He appear at the Liverpool Local Court on 21 October 2015 and thereafter as may be required.' 'He reside at 7 Phillip Street, Liverpool.' 'He not be absent from 7 Phillip Street, Liverpool between...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment