Brennan v Brennan [1953] HCA 28

Brennan v Brennan [1953] HCA 28

There was no breach of s. 77 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1899-1951 as all oral evidence was already taken in open court before Edwards J. and the later use of the transcript by Clancy J., done in open court and by consent of all parties, did not constitute a fundamental miscarriage of justice or invalidate the proceedings; furthermore, party acquiescence precludes later complaint about the adopted procedure.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['matrimonial Causes' 'divorce' 'adultery' 'desertion' 'decree Nisi' 'decree Absolute' 'procedural Irregularity']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceedings before Clancy J. constituted a breach of section 77 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1899-1951 (NSW) regarding evidence taken in open court' 'Whether a decree nisi obtained in the manner described is void or voidable and its effect under section 28 of the Matrimonial Causes Act' 'Whether acquiescence by the parties to the procedure adopted precludes complaint about irregularity']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no breach of s. 77 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1899-1951 as all oral evidence was already taken in open court before Edwards J. and the later use of the transcript by Clancy J., done in open court and by consent of all parties, did not constitute a fundamental miscarriage of justice or invalidate the proceedings; furthermore, party acquiescence precludes later complaint about the adopted procedure.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Decree nisi below varied: findings on the second, fourth, and fifth issues set aside and re-determined; second issue found in the affirmative; fourth and fifth issues in the negative.' "Order dissolving marriage for adultery set aside; dissolution instead on grounds of husband's wilful desertion for three years...