BT Securities Limited v Lobel [2011] NSWSC 335

BT Securities Limited v Lobel [2011] NSWSC 335

The defendant's defences regarding the execution and enforceability of the loan agreement are so obviously untenable that they cannot possibly succeed. The agreement is enforceable according to its terms, whether or not it was executed as a deed, and the proper authorisation was given for its execution. BTS is entitled to summary judgment.

Parties
First Plaintiff: BT Securities Limited; Second Plaintiff: Westpac Banking Corporation; Defendant: Brent Calvin Lobel
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Decision
Outcome
Plaintiff entitled to summary judgment
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Power of Attorney, Loan Agreements
Practice and Procedure Summary Judgment Power of Attorney Loan Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BT Securities Limited

First Plaintiff

Westpac Banking Corporation

Second Plaintiff

Brent Calvin Lobel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant has a viable defence to the plaintiff's claim for repayment of money advanced under a loan agreement
  2. 2 Whether the loan agreement executed under power of attorney was valid and enforceable
  3. 3 Whether execution of the loan agreement as a deed was invalid due to lack of authority under seal

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's defences regarding the execution and enforceability of the loan agreement are so obviously untenable that they cannot possibly succeed. The agreement is enforceable according to its terms, whether or not it was executed as a deed, and the proper authorisation was given for its execution. BTS is entitled to summary judgment.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff entitled to summary judgment

Orders

  • First plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment.
  • Parties to bring in short minutes of order.