Appeal of Brent Thomas James Slater [2008] NSWDC 170
Although the judge had not formed a final view and considered that his earlier comments expressed concern rather than a proposed course of action, the low threshold for apprehended bias meant it was possible that an informed lay observer might form the view that he had prejudged the case. The judge therefore disqualified himself.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal From Local Court / Crown Application for Judge to Disqualify Himself From Hearing the Appeal
- Outcome
- Application by Crown to disqualify judge from hearing the appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehended Bias' 'disqualification of Judge' 'appeals to District Court From Local Court' 'bail Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal From Local Court / Crown Application for Judge to Disqualify Himself From Hearing the Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the judge should disqualify himself from hearing the appeal on the basis of apprehended bias arising from comments made after reading the transcript.' 'Whether an informed lay observer might form the view that the judge had prejudged the case.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the judge had not formed a final view and considered that his earlier comments expressed concern rather than a proposed course of action, the low threshold for apprehended bias meant it was possible that an informed lay observer might form the view that he had prejudged the case. The judge therefore disqualified himself.
Court Disposition
Application by Crown to disqualify judge from hearing the appeal granted.
Orders
- ['The judge disqualified himself from the case.' 'The matter was stood over to a date to be dealt with at Wollongong.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment