Thomas, Brett David v R [2017] NSWCCA 273
The sentence was quashed and a new sentence imposed to account for 17 days served in custody solely on the relevant offences, reflecting the parties' agreement and correcting the error in commencement date, in accordance with the statutory requirement for appeals to result in quashing and substitution rather than variation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Determination and Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentence quashed and substituted sentence imposed correcting commencement date.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'detain for Advantage' 'backdating Sentences' 'aggregate Sentencing' 'appeal Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Determination and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence should be quashed and a new sentence imposed due to insufficient backdating to account for time served solely on the offences sentenced']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was quashed and a new sentence imposed to account for 17 days served in custody solely on the relevant offences, reflecting the parties' agreement and correcting the error in commencement date, in accordance with the statutory requirement for appeals to result in quashing and substitution rather than variation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentence quashed and substituted sentence imposed correcting commencement date.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal allowed in part.' 'Sentence imposed by the District Court on Brett Thomas on 16 December 2015 be quashed and in lieu thereof the following sentence be imposed: Brett David Thomas is sentenced to an aggregate sentence for both counts 1 and 2 of a non-parole period of 3 years and 6...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment