Grogan and ors v First Rate Leisure Pty Limited and ors [2007] NSWADT 294
Both the first and fourth respondents are severally liable to each applicant for the racial discrimination that took place on 15 and 16 May 2004 at the Sydney Junction Hotel, as the security guards employed by the fourth respondent, on the instructions of the night manager representing the first respondent, refused entry to the applicants on the basis of their Aboriginal race, thereby breaching ss 7(1)(a) and 19 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The respondents failed to establish any valid defence, including by reference to training, policies or the operation of the Liquor Act, and are each ordered to pay $15,000 to each applicant as compensation.
- Parties
- Applicant: Brett Grogan; Applicant: Tony Grogan; Applicant: Wayne Weldon; Applicant: David Dargin; Applicant: Theresa Towers; Applicant: Kristine Bamblett; First Respondent: First Rate Leisure Pty Limited; Second Respondent: Hugh Halpin; Third Respondent: Damian Terrence O'Reilly; Fourth Respondent: Knightland Home Security Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Anti Discrimination Complaint / Final Merits Decision
- Outcome
- The complaint of unlawful discrimination on the ground of race is substantiated against the first and fourth respondents. The first and fourth respondents are severally liable.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Provision of Goods and Services, Vicarious Liability, Victimisation, Remedies Under Anti Discrimination Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brett Grogan
Applicant
Tony Grogan
Applicant
Wayne Weldon
Applicant
David Dargin
Applicant
Theresa Towers
Applicant
Kristine Bamblett
Applicant
First Rate Leisure Pty Limited
First Respondent
Hugh Halpin
Second Respondent
Damian Terrence O'Reilly
Third Respondent
Knightland Home Security Pty Limited
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Anti Discrimination Complaint / Final Merits Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exclusion of applicants from licensed premises constituted unlawful race discrimination under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the first and fourth respondents are vicariously liable for the acts of their employees under s 53 of the Act
- 3 Whether liability is joint, several, or joint and several
Ratio Decidendi
Both the first and fourth respondents are severally liable to each applicant for the racial discrimination that took place on 15 and 16 May 2004 at the Sydney Junction Hotel, as the security guards employed by the fourth respondent, on the instructions of the night manager representing the first respondent, refused entry to the applicants on the basis of their Aboriginal race, thereby breaching ss 7(1)(a) and 19 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The respondents failed to establish any valid defence, including by reference to training, policies or the operation of the Liquor Act, and are each ordered to pay $15,000 to each applicant as compensation.
Court Disposition
The complaint of unlawful discrimination on the ground of race is substantiated against the first and fourth respondents. The first and fourth respondents are severally liable.
Orders
- The complaint of unlawful discrimination on the ground of race is substantiated against the first and fourth respondents.
- The first and fourth respondents are to pay to each applicant within 21 days, the sum of $15,000, for which the respondents are severally liable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment