Puxty v Monarch Advisory Group Pty Ltd (Costs) [2023] FCA 650
The applicant's grounds for appeal were misconceived, with factual and legal errors, and persisted despite the respondent's efforts to clearly articulate their deficiencies. This led to significant unnecessary increase in costs, warranting indemnity costs from 16 September 2021. Costs of this costs application to be paid by the applicant on the normal basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs (appeal Extension/leave) / Post Refusal of Leave to Appeal, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Indemnity costs awarded in part; costs of costs application awarded to respondent
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'costs on Appeal' 'civil Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs (appeal Extension/leave) / Post Refusal of Leave to Appeal, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded for the application for extension of time and leave to appeal' 'Whether costs of this costs application should be paid']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's grounds for appeal were misconceived, with factual and legal errors, and persisted despite the respondent's efforts to clearly articulate their deficiencies. This led to significant unnecessary increase in costs, warranting indemnity costs from 16 September 2021. Costs of this costs application to be paid by the applicant on the normal basis.
Court Disposition
Indemnity costs awarded in part; costs of costs application awarded to respondent
Orders
- ["Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the application for extension of time and leave to appeal on party and party basis up to and including 15 September 2021" "Applicant to pay respondent's costs of the application for extension of time and leave to appeal on indemnity basis from 16 September 2021" "Applicant to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment